“Skepticism cannot be revolutionary, even though it speaks the language of revolution.” ― Raymond Aron
Pls Click To Support This Blog，TQ!
Donations Are Welcome,to keep Arus Lawan's blogger continue his passion & struggle,Thanks 4 your support.
If you don't owned a Paypal account,you can pay via bank tranfer or online banking，pls contact 4 further details：
[ This is a talk to the opening session of the Malaysian Socialist Party’s Socialism 2005 conference, held September 9-11, in Kuala Lumpur. At the time Percy was national secretary of the Democratic Socialist Perspective. Along with others he was expelled from the DSP in May 2008, and is now the national secretary of the Revolutionary Socialist Party.]Comrades, I bring the warmest greetings of solidarity from the DSP in Australia, from our youth organisation Resistance, and from the newspaper Green Left Weekly, and I congratulate the comrades from the Malaysian Socialist Party for organising this inspiring conference.
Capitalist barbarism exists still, socialism is relevant!
Just look around the world and you see capitalism is in crisis. We’re faced with wars, environmental disasters, the squalor of poverty, unemployment, homelessness, and exploitation.
US imperialism is even more aggressive and arrogant; they’re open about their preemptive strike doctrine.
In Iraq, they’re contemplating staying 12 more years, sending more troops, and the imperialists are threatening other countries.
They want to keep their nuclear monopoly, and consider using it, and are utterly hypocritical in attacking the nuclear programs of Third World countries. This year is the 60th anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, “The worst terrorist attack in history.”
In Palestine, real apartheid is being consolidated, ethnic cleansing with the full backing of imperialism.
Global warming is a fact, climatic extremes and melting icecaps.
Genetically modified crops are being forced on us, Monsato aiming to monopolise the seeds of the planet for its profits, with monstrous consequences.
The US invades and occupies countries on the other side of the world, but can’t rescue, or care for, its own citizens in New Orleans after such a huge natural disaster (They’re poor and Black!)
The gap is widening between rich and poor, between countries, and within countries.
In the richest country in the world, the USA, the wealthiest 1 percent has more assets than the poorest 90 per cent of Americans combined.
80 per cent of the world’s domestic product belongs to 1 billion people living in the developed world, while the remaining 20 percent is shared by 5 billion people living in developing countries.
Africa is a disaster area.
Yet you see the obscene wealth, the luxury for a few, with millionaires living in their gated suburbs, and venturing out in luxury cruise liners to gawk at the poor of the world.
Read the statistics in their own financial papers, and do the sums: the share to wages is falling; the share to profits is rising, and goes to the few.
Certainly there’s much to be angry about, much to resist and fight.
Capitalism the guarantor of socialism
150 years ago Marx and Engels eloquently described in the Communist Manifesto the dynamics of the capitalist system and the destiny of the working class as the system’s gravediggers. Capitalist apologists since then have tried to refute or ridicule Marx’s prediction. But each pompous sigh of relief, or declaration of “the end of history” after any temporary capitalist stabilisation or working class defeat, quickly is refuted by reality.
Far from proving the permanence of capitalism and the futility of hoping for an alternative system, their “globalisation” shows just the opposite. Advances in humanity’s productive forces show the potential to solve all the major problems facing the world – food and shelter and clean water for everyone; decent health care and education; a high level of culture for us all.
But under capitalism, it leads to crisis.
"The real barrier of capitalist production is capital itself," wrote Marx in the third volume of Capital.
Capitalism suffers from long-term structural contradictions which threaten its destruction. Far from being something dynamic and new, neo-liberal globalisation – the frenetic international expansion of capital, an expansion which has had devastating consequences for the majority of humanity – is a sign of economic decay and increasing instability.
But even if many of us recognise that capitalism’s the source of our problems and agree on the need for getting rid of capitalism, what will replace it?
How to get there?
We as socialists have a wonderful vision of what society could be like. A society where human beings don’t exploit other human beings, where there are no classes, where there’s equality, freedom, real democracy. Where people produce for need, not for the profit of someone else. Where ordinary people have control over their own lives, where the productive forces of society are used to give a decent life to everyone on the planet, where the waste of capitalism is eliminated, and wars, racial and gender discrimination are relics of a dim barbaric past.
It’s called socialism. But how can it happen? Our rulers seem all-powerful. It looks like an impossible task. Who can do it? The working class has the interest, and the power to do it. Workers are trained under the social production of capitalism to run society, without the parasites. Today, the working class of the world is bigger and stronger than ever before.
But workers internationally are divided, swayed by the capitalists’ propaganda, cowed by their power and violence. We’re not going to overcome this as individuals. We need to organise collectively, counter their propaganda, use our numbers and united strength to counter their violence.
To organise, and educate, and preserve and spread the lessons of past defeats and victories, we need a party. We need a party with a socialist program, learning from Lenin and Marx, learning from the lessons of the October 1917 Russian Revolution, learning from the betrayals and distortions of Stalinism.
We need a party that learns from current struggles, learns from the Cuban Revolution, a party that helps organise and unite in struggle all the oppressed, a party that is flexible in its tactics.
The challenge today is to construct such parties in all countries.
Throughout the Third World for decades the workers, peasants, urban poor have been rebelling on a daily basis. But more and more people, especially young people, in the First World are waking up to capitalism’s neo-liberal offensive, against the workers and poor at home, and to their brutal exploitation of the rest of the world.
Workers still mobilise in advanced capitalist countries. In Australia, on June 30, July 1, this year, thousands marched against the proposed industrial relations laws threatened by Australian Prime Minister John Howard.
Over the last ten years in Australia, there have been big actions and movements:
Campaigns in support of refugees;
Marches in support of Aboriginal reconciliation;
Demonstrations supporting East Timor independence;
Actions in defence of the waterside workers union under attack;
Demonstrations against corporate globalisation, such as on September 11, 2001;
And huge demonstrations against the pending invasion of Iraq, when 1.2 million people demonstrated around Australia, with 500,000 in Sydney.
These campaigns have not necessarily been long-lasting; the movement can rise quickly, and then quickly dissipate. But it can’t be denied that they were big, reflecting widespread consciousness and feelings and changes in society, and the potential for future struggle.
Cause for hope
But there’s been demoralisation on the left, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the restoration of capitalism in China. There’s a feeling of despair among the older generation of socialist activists.
But we have to recognise that the real defeat had happened much earlier, with the defeat of the original Leninist leadership of the Bolshevik revolution. The Stalinist degeneration, and the blackening and distortion of the image of socialism was a long drawn out price paid by the world working class. We just paid the final installment with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
But there is cause for hope, optimism.
Socialism is necessary, logical, and relevant, and real! Developments in Latin America are very exciting. Socialism still exists in Cuba, despite US imperialism’s efforts at invasion, blockade, and assassination attempts (yes, that’s not new, it’s just “inappropriate” to talk about it)
Revolution is on the march, in Venezuela, and having an impact on the rest of Latin America. We’re seeing the first socialist revolution of the 21st century.
60 Australian comrades have just returned from a very inspiring Venezuelan Solidarity Brigade we organised that culminated at the World Youth Festival in Caracas.
Our comrades saw the support on the ground for the revolutionary process, visited factories where workers are in control, met with people’s organisations, the missions, for literacy at all levels, the free kitchens, the clinics, saw in action some of the 25,000 Cuban doctors and nurses providing real help and solidarity.
Socialism or barbarism
At the World Youth Festival, Chavez spoke to the leaders of the delegations, and reminded them of the dilemma posed by both Karl Marx and Rosa Luxemburg, the choice of “socialism or barbarism”.
Chavez pointed out that “Karl Marx could reflect, think and write looking towards a distant future, a century, the same could be said of Rosa Luxemburg…..but for us it can’t. The circumstances have changed terribly. The situation today is radically different. We don’t have centuries in front of us, it could be decades at most that are left for the peoples of this planet to make a decision. Or we really change the social and economic order, we give real form, viability and outlet for socialism, we say now a new, renovated socialism of the 21st century, or we decide that life finishes on this planet. We no longer have the long time that Karl Marx had...
“This reflection,” said Chavez, “is something I feel deep in my heart because of my profound conviction that the planet is being degraded more and more everyday, and that life on this planet is under threat. Because of this today more than ever the dilemma has returned with much more force, ‘socialism or barbarism’.
”I believe it is time that we take up with courage and clarity a political, social, collective and ideological offensive across the world,” said Chavez. “A real offensive that permits us to move progressively, over the next years, the next decades, leaving behind the perverse, destructive, destroyer, capitalist model and go forward in constructing the socialist model to avoid barbarism and beyond that the annihilation of life on this planet. I believe this idea has a strong connection with reality. I don’t think we have much time. Fidel Castro said in one of his speeches I read not so long ago, ‘tomorrow could be too late, let’s do now what we need to do’.”
These thoughts should reinforce in our minds the urgent need for socialism, and the actual relevance of socialism in the world today.
Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka launched a newly formed Nigerian political party Saturday, using the power of rhetoric to challenge apathetic voters in the oil-rich nation to overcome a government he called cynical and brutal. Members of the Democratic Front for a People’s Federation elected Soyinka as its leader during the party’s inaugural meeting. The 76-year-old essayist, easily recognizable by a shock of white hair, later told reporters he wouldn’t run as a candidate in the nation’s 2011 presidential election. Instead, Soyinka promised the party would use the power of persuasion and words to affect the outcome of an election many worry will be tainted by political thuggery, violence and ballot-box stuffing. But it remains unclear what effect a party that pledges to take in no money will have in a nation where stolen oil money fuels the whims of the political elite. “It is an experiment … that directly challenges those who grumble that there is no platform, no springboard from which they can propose the political arena fresh and innovative ideas,” Soyinka told those gathered at a Lagos hotel ballroom Saturday. The party is “a question mark gouged into the landscape; the question that reads: Is it really impossible to have a voice unless you’re swimming in millions?” Nigeria, home to 150 million people, has conducted a string of criticized elections since becoming a democracy more than a decade ago. Its 2011 election, scheduled to be held in January, likely will be moved back over concerns about having enough time to register an estimated 70 million registered voters. The nation’s National Assembly meets Monday to discuss postponing the election. Since the hand over in 1999 from military rule to a civilian government, Nigerian politics have been dominated by the ruling People’s Democratic Party. The party’s operatives have the political connections and muscle necessary to control Nigeria’s unruly and corrupt electoral system. Soyinka’s party describes itself as a “zero resource” party, a jab at Nigeria’s culture of government graft and corruption. The writer said that would be the only way to shake a nation still propped up by “military scaffolding.” “The nation is comprehensively sucked dry by a minority that is so lubricated that they slip out of grasp when their hands are caught in the till,” Soyinka said. “This party resolves to overturn the lugubrious arrangement by which the national cake is swallowed entire by those whose appointed task is to serve their employer, which is the sovereign electorate.” Soyinka won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1986, the first African honored with the award. The essayist and playwright has a penchant for the dramatic, once single-handedly storming a Nigerian radio station with a pistol to try to prevent a corrupt politician from claiming an election victory. But he also served as a staunch critic of the excesses of the military dictators who pilfered Nigeria’s oil money for years after the nation’s gained its independence from Britain in 1960. More recently, Soyinka led a protest in Nigeria’s capital Abuja over the long-term hospitalization of late President Umaru Yar’Adua, whose absence ground government to a halt for months. As Soyinka grows older, it has yet to be seen who among the nation’s teeming youth population will take up the mantle of Nigeria’s writer- and agitator-in-chief. That apathy could be seen Saturday, as the hotel banquet hall where the party met had numerous empty seats, a rarity in the political culture of rented crowd in Africa’s most populous nation. As Soyinka spoke, loud hip hop bled through the walls from the hotel’s pool, where the privileged and apparently oblivious youth played. -AP（from Nigerians Abroad Magazine）