Pls Click To Support This Blog,TQ!

請支持原創~讓鬥爭持續下去!

《逆流世代》屬非盈利,幾年來不斷勤於發表大馬政治時事評論,免費供網友們閱讀。請給予支持,樂捐些稿酬於部落客,信用卡與Paypal都OK,有多少就多少~再次感謝您熱心的支持。 Donations Are Welcome,to keep Arus Lawan's blogger continue his passion & struggle,Thanks 4 your support. 若無Paypal帳號,您可以透過銀行或網絡轉帳進行匯款,請聯繫: If you don't owned a Paypal account,you can pay via bank tranfer or online banking,pls contact 4 further details: kawasaki918ken@yahoo.com.tw

2008年12月7日星期日

叶盛茂一案看大马“国家机密”

台 湾前总统陈水扁洗钱弊案新发现-“太子”陈致中洗钱破绽,前调查局部长叶盛茂被判十年牢,大快人心!这证明了什么?司法的污点正式被揭秘,瘫痪已久的国家 机器即将复苏;另一方面则加速了整个洗钱案的发展,而阿扁竟然道出一句此乃国家机密,判处叶盛茂是触犯了国家机密?真是百年一大笑话!

阿 扁执政八年全面扭转了三权分立的民主制度,将司法取纳成专门为“扁家王朝”的附属机构,为他服务。叶盛茂这伙人被法官直接判刑,可见是在警告那被关押的死 不悔改的前总统,这伟大的前总统将自己比作“伟人”,贪污贪来的钱还可以当“建国资金”,黑比作白,死都可以说成活的。贪污若能被当做国家机密的话,那还 有什么不是国家机密的么?叶盛茂被讥讽成“狗”、“情报头子”是情有可言的,叶盛茂身为一国之调查局局长,不仅助纣为虐,还处处帮助扁家洗钱、掩盖实情, 确实是阿扁的“狗”兼给予阿扁“情报”的人,虽然他一毛钱也得不到,十年还是判太轻了,可还能怎么样?虽说他是代罪羔羊,却是罪有应得。他那背后的扁家等 人才是真正主谋,无辜以否,叶盛茂无论使劲什么办法,已没有脱身的可能。不是国家机密,是扁家机密才对,叶盛茂不是为司法公正、为人民服务,他是扁的幕 僚,只为扁家服务。

想起我们大马也有个奇怪的法令叫OSA(Official Secrets Act),国家机密也,不仅不能过问,谁想揭开它的可能还会被判刑。OSA是老旧的法令,是紧急状态时发明出来的东东,相较之下,民主自由的台湾早已脱离 独裁时期,哪来的国家机密?要是能证明阿扁贪污案有罪,恐怕连国家机密都被逼要撬开来调查!可看看大马的政府,一条ISA还不够,还要拿OSA来欺压老百 姓,那些官僚用了多少钱、发展计划所动用的资金统统不的过问,看了还会触犯国家法律,怪不得国家的贪污越来越严重且无法活得解决!我们那大喊肃贪的伯拉 啊,我们国家所累计的弊案多到可以堆积成山了,你以为解决了一个司法丑闻,付了前法官赔偿金就能了事了吗?老马却可以高枕无忧,而他所犯下的罪过完全由国 家来承担吗?国家机密到底是什么?是为那些无耻的人擦屁股的工具?有OSA就可以乱抓人?

大马的司法复兴了吗?起码从叶盛 茂这起案子中,我看见了台湾法律已尽一切能力在清洗扁执政时期的“余孽”和烂摊子,估计将贪污的扁家一众人定罪后,国家与司法才可算是真正回复元气吧?否 则就得永久卡在当下乌烟瘴气的环境中。先不去算国民党时期的历史,阿扁治国不过八年,大马那好样的执政党已经统治了五十年,对付马共的苛刻法令拿来对待人 民,饱了、富了那些官员,贪污、贿赂、滥权又不能治他们罪,人民欲哭无泪。以台湾的叶盛茂被判刑一案作为借鉴,什么国家机密全是无稽之谈,贪官腐败就得绳 之于法,为民伸冤,这才是民主,起码是最根本的!

当今大马-12月7日 中午12点23分



2008年11月13日星期四

无耻者阿扁


李敖大师曰:“台湾历史上最不要脸的人物,第一名:陈水扁、第二名:陈水扁、第三名:陈水扁”,陈水扁一人连夺三冠也不是莫无道理的。陈水扁这人,自登上中华民国-台湾省“总统”,就已表露出了这名大名鼎鼎的人物注定是中国-台湾历史上最无耻的政客、最贪婪的贪官。他是美丽岛事件的历史;他是民进党早期的优秀党员、立法委员;台北市市长,又如何?2000年总统大选,台湾人民急着要打倒霸权主义的中国国民党,连战萧万长配、宋楚瑜两号大人物败选;“ 台湾之父”李登辉(“岩里政男”)都不及这位“台湾之子”高票当选总统,台湾历史刷新一页。



可阿扁这“卡小”这得尽了总统的责任吗?最初是立法不该谈台独问题的,就是他本人。他的内阁总是不停地在更换,换了一届又一届,结果全都一堆贪官,特别侦察组所捕获的甚至被当局审判入狱的绝大多数都是阿扁幕僚里著名的政客,阿扁这八年来的政府要真被称为“贪污政府”也并不为过。阿扁搞了八年,第一届新政府不但没改善民生问题,数不尽的烂摊子没收拾,却一昧地在激化台湾民族主义,使其膨胀。十多年前,侯孝贤导演拍摄的一部名为《悲情城市》的电影,恰好阿扁政府的王牌、唯一的底牌就是“悲情”。八年多来,阿扁的败绩统统推给国民党的霸权和腐败、中国大陆打压台湾经济,却完全不知道这就是自己政府的无能和自我从国际上隔离的结果,台湾人是在有够悲情...不是因为被大陆欺压、不是为外省人欺负,而是自愿被民进党政府虐待,这种自虐行为就是阿扁时代所形成之怪现象。



2008 年,阿扁/民进党政府终于倒了,马英九的贪腐案无疑是民进党当局强加的帽子,最终背叛无罪。而阿扁家族自其执政时期一直都无法解决的第一家庭洗钱弊案仍在进审查行中,目前的金额尽然已高达了数亿美元,台湾人民到底看清了这位伟大人物没有?他家族成员与相关人士在国外到底有多少人头账户、收了企业界多少钱、政治贿金有多少皆成了全世界所关注的大课题。阿扁这样的人可以当两任总统,而且还亏空了台湾人民那么多的钱,台湾人是无知还是假装不在乎,阿扁这号败类还可以相信的吗?什么台湾建国资金,这就是他的悲情牌,死到临头还自比台独英雄,实在是有辱真正“斗士”的脸。阿扁全家无疑都是贼!阿辉伯就险些被拖入弊案,声称:“他要死就自己去死,别将所有的人都拖下水”,可真的是拖下水那么简单吗?前政府到底有多少政客收了阿扁的钱,目前还不可而知,但迟早必定能水落石出吧。



2006年,施明德的“倒扁运动”没法将阿扁拉倒是个遗憾,可2008年总统大选,台湾人民就依靠手中的选票决定了民进党政府的生死。为什么当张铭清来台时还会遭到袭击?绿色分子越变越绿,估计已经深陷在台独虚无主义的泥潭中,无法自拔的地步了。蔡英文这老娘子根本就没办法控制自己的部下,这号人物是民进党无大将的滥竽充数例子。阿扁这前领导人就在后面叫嚣,深绿分子还真信他那一套,上街游行去大喊大叫。陈云林访台,绿色分子暴民无法无天展开骚动、打警察,口喊“反共”、“反马”,民进党的街头运动文化已经不在,换来的是228时期的暴民文化;民进党最后的底牌已经打出,估计也已经玩完,一无所有。陈云林回去了,两岸签下了有利于台湾很多的协议书,这怎么叫“卖台”?台湾完全占了中国大陆便宜了嘛!



阿扁于11月11日终于被收押了,却没看见什么骚动的情况发生,明显的台湾人民早已筋疲力尽,阿扁被收押早就是众人所预测的结果,想法的还得怪罪当局为何那么迟才将他拘捕收押呢。反之,没有泛蓝分子的欢呼声,也没有多少泛绿分子在街上为他打气或引起纠纷,阿扁心冷了。台湾人民受够了,这一群人不但丢尽了台湾的面子,还吃尽了台湾人民辛苦转来的金钱,这群人活着还有意义吗?阿扁就算不能宣判终身监禁或死刑,起码他全家都要该吃牢饭,这才是公道!否则天理何在?民主与法制是干嘛用的?可以再高喊“阿扁万岁”的人我想已经是个无可救药、病入膏盲的白痴兼弱智了,真要佩服他们的“挺扁”精神,可笑也。

Analysis:Why Obama won

Ben Smith, Jonathan Martin Ben Smith, Jonathan Martin – Wed Nov 5, 2:37 am ET
“POLITICO”

Barack Obama’s sweeping victory as president of the United States sends him to the White House to face what may be the worst national financial crisis since the time of Franklin Roosevelt’s election in 1932.


Obama won on his own terms, strategically and symbolically. He rolled up a series of contested states, from Colorado to Virginia,long out of Democratic reach. And his victory reflected the accuracy ofhis vision of a reshaped country. Racism, much discussed, turned out tobe a footnote, and African-American turnout was not unusually high.Instead, Obama drew his strength from an array of racially mixed,growing areas around cities like Orlando, Washington, Indianapolis, and Columbus on his way to at least 334 electoral votes.


“Even as we celebrate tonight we know that the challenges tomorrow willbring are the greatest of our lifetime: two wars, a planet in peril,the worst financial crisis in a century,” Obama told a crowd of morethan 100,000 in Chicago’s Grant Park.


The assembled crowd had been strangely silent through the evening, even as Obama shut the door for McCain by winning New Hampshire and Pennsylvania, and even after his victory in Ohio pointed toward a landslide, seemingly unwilling to accept or believe the impending victory.


Only at 11:00 p.m., when CNN declared that Obama had surpassed 270 electoral votes, did the crowd roar in approval.


"This victory alone is not the change we seek — it is only the chanceto make that change," Obama said, standing between two bulletproofglass walls.

McCain, speaking in a somber concession speech outside the Phoenixhotel where he married his wife, declared that he had done what hecould.


"I don't know what more we could have done to try to win this election," he said.

Calling Obama "my president," McCain vowed to work with him to helprepair a nation facing profound challenges at home and abroad.


"These are difficult times for our country, and I pledge to him tonightto do all in my power to help him lead us through the many challengeswe face," McCain said.

After booing Obama's name and offering a few jeers, the crowd came torecognize the history in the evening when McCain paid tribute to thenation's first black president by recalling his own favoritecommander-in-chief.


"A century ago, President Theodore Roosevelt's invitation of Booker T. Washington to dine at the White Housewas taken as an outrage in many quarters," McCain recalled. "Americatoday is a world away from the cruel and prideful bigotry of that time.There is no better evidence of this than the election of anAfrican-American to the presidency of the United States."


For the first time, claps and even a few cheers were heard from the dejected crowd.

Obama’s win came with Democratic gains in the Senate and House, though his broad victory — he swept swing states ranging from Indiana to Ohioto Virginia — was perhaps even more dramatic than his party’s successin congressional races. Obama and other Democratic leaders quicklysignaled their awareness of the risk of overreaching, with Obamaavoiding any claim of partisan victory, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid going further.


"This is a mandate to get along, to get something done in a bipartisanway. This is not a mandate for a political party or an ideology,” Reidtold Politico.

As grand as the symbolism of Obama’s victory was, it was also a victory for his steady, corporate campaign management.The campaign’s early decision to play on a more ambitious map thanother Democratic nominees was the source of his mandate. And the resultclosely mirrored the PowerPoint presentation his campaign manager,David Plouffe, pitched to sometimes-skeptical audiences of reportersand donors.



McCain’s campaign blamed larger forces for their candidate’s defeat.

“We were crushed by circumstance,” communications director Jill Hazelbaker said after McCain’s speech. “The economic crisis was a pivotal point in this race.”

External factors aside, McCain and his campaign also lagged far behindObama in every key metric — money, organization, discipline — andfailed to embrace Obama's organizational model or the technology itborrowed from the private sector.


Earlier campaigns had celebrated their technological prowess,but in Obama’s cutting-edge campaign, new political technology wasimplemented and came of age, evidenced by its vaunted fundraisingmachine and its “Houdini” computer system, which enabled the campaignas late as Tuesday afternoon to identify and bring to the polls a lastwave of supporters who hadn’t yet voted.


The coalition Obama assembled proved as modern as the technology his campaign employed.


In his clear-cut victory, Obama became the first Democrat to win a majority of American votes since Jimmy Carter’s 1976 election. He won states just months ago thought to be impregnable to his party, places that just four years ago went for President Bush by double-digits: Virginia, Indiana, and North Carolina among them.

Indeed, Obama won in all regions of the country but the DeepSouth, piling up big wins in the perennial Democratic bulwarks on bothcoasts and making deep inroads into New South states, the industrialand agricultural heartland and the fast-growing Rocky Mountain West.


But perhaps most spectacularly, he found victory with amultiracial coalition that has the makings of a formidable politicalbase of power.


If his was the first 21st century campaign, his victory waspowered by a new face of America: comprised of all ethnicities, hailingmostly from cities and suburbs, largely under 40 years old, and amongall income classes.

As they emphatically proved by obliterating the presidentialcolor line, many of these voters are not guided by traditional culturalattachment to race, religion or region.


What makes his victory so resounding, and so daunting forRepublicans, was that he combined support from African-Americans, Jews,and young whites with other key groups. He also reversed PresidentBush’s advances with Hispanic voters.

Further, and even more worrisome for the GOP,Obama was dominant among self-described “moderate” voters, a 60 percentswath of Americans larger than either self-described liberals orconservatives.


This 21st century coalition allowed Obama to blow out McCain incities and suburbs where Bush had narrowly won or lost by smallermargins four years ago, and to pull off narrow wins in Virginia, NorthCarolina, Florida, Indiana and Ohio.


He ran up huge margins in heavily-black cities and counties in each,but was able to edge out McCain thanks to big wins in populous,racially-mixed localities like Northern Virginia's Fairfax County (59percent), Charlotte’s Mecklenburg County (62 percent), Orlando’s Orange County (59 percent), Indianapolis’s Marion County (64 percent) and Columbus’s Franklin County (59 percent).


The coalition underscored the theme that made Obama famous in 2004, andone that he returned to in his victory speech, citing his support from“young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white,Latino, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and notdisabled — Americans who sent a message to the world that we have neverbeen a collection of Red States and Blue States: we are, and always will be, the United States of America."

2008年10月28日星期二

中国研究:大国文化之崛起

有关外国人研究中国的一门科系-中国研究,其微妙之处在于他分为文学类和非文学类,广义的即为Chinese Studies,中国学,关于中国的、中国人的全面研究;而狭义则只局限于文史哲类进行研究的Sinology,汉学也。只是后者的形成较早,是文化交流的产物,而前者多半牵扯到政治问题。

阅读毕《环球时报》于10月24日刊登的一篇题为“研究中国,世界又热又冷”,而其副题则是“美国的中国研究最发达,非洲拉美差距较大”,于是有感欲发而写了这篇短文。拉美和非洲国家自冷战开始至结束便处于两极化阵营的争夺地盘站点,尤其是美帝国与西方势力的插手使非洲人民的独立解放战争陷入困境;再来的一大难题就是苏联,中苏关系在前世纪60年代正式决裂,苏联欲在非洲与西方对抗,一边建立更多的亲苏联的友好“卫星国”(satellites)。

自新中国建立始,中国处于援助与建立国际关系,曾经派遣众多的技师到一些贫苦的国家去参与发展建设,非洲国家当时亦有亲中立场的,是基于中国给予无条件的奉献,而非如苏联那样的只讲求回报和利益关系,最显著的便是阿尔巴尼亚。毕竟中国当时输出的是一种慷慨无私、促进外交关系的策略而并非文化(就算是,也不过是新兴的社会主义色彩之文化),那些国家又怎么会特地去研究中国呢?

美国之所以研究中国不如说是一种“防范策略”,不管是解放战争、朝鲜战争抑或越南战争,中国身为共产主义国家起码战胜了美国与西方三次,无人不恐惧红色中国是影响亚洲地带最直接的“第二个苏联”,因此千方百计想干涉亚洲各国的内政,整肃红色思想在各国的泛滥(red purge),以建立亲美亲西方的政权,印度、南越、印尼、菲律宾哪个不是美国的“亲密战友”?在这一些国家里甚至还有实行排华政策的,中国文化散播的范围与空间基本相等于不存在。美国当初设立的中国研究无非是对华政策的战略研究,至今恐怕依然如此,褒贬者参半。我所知道的中国研究权威当中,费正清(John K.Fairbank)是个特例,可说是将中国看得最透彻的一位,其立场由于较为中立(对中共抱公平态度),不像华裔学者黄仁宇、余英时等人的亲美、国民党立场(在李敖大师眼里所谓的“历史学家”)。

70年代尤其是改革开放才是中国研究崛起的时顷,极左不再是一种“特色”,中国传统文化得以发扬的同时,加上中国经济与社会的变迁,让更多国家对中国这个神秘国土逐渐产生了兴趣,而不是单纯的怀疑与鄙视的刻板印象(stereotype),中国研究在西方已成了热门学科,已非冷战时期的那种冷门学系了。除大国之外,一些小国包括非洲拉美等地也已形成了汉语热,这是研究中国前的必备条件;可由于长期的封锁状态和美国的挑拨离间,又或者是当地人民多数无受教育背景之关系,知识相当之有限,除了实行共产主义的古巴,“中国”和东方世界在拉美等地异常陌生,尤其“神秘”;举个最鲜明的例子,秘鲁人就搞不清前任首相藤森是日本人还是中国人,干脆称他为“中国男孩”(china boy)。

相反的,中国才是拥有最多外语专才的国度,关于各国研究的科系(studies)在中国大学府基本都已设立,外语系以及外语学院遍布各地,形成了一种学习外语的潮流。孔子学院既是中国输出传统文化的工具之一,藉着学习汉语潮流的到来,中国研究必能随着这波潮流迅速成为一门重要的科系,无论是了解中国抑或中国的正经文社教都好,确实已证实了中国已是个影响世界的大国,其大国形象已渐恢复成型中。多数国家现已将中文定格为国家必修之外语,甚至是第二外语,美国纽约市也已立法规定中文为母语,加拿大更是如此。中国研究之学问,总的来说是以语言为先决条件,随之才得以更全面地去掌握与捉摸中国更深层的一面,揭开其(在外国人心中)深藏已久的神秘感。

2008年10月24日星期五

VIVA REVOLUSI 1948!










phot0 from:http://revolusi48.blogspot.com/

美国总统候选人辩论会观后感,比较大马政治辩论会

在YOUTUBE视频观看了美国总统候选人的FINAL辩论,奥巴马VS麦凯恩,一小时半的过程中二人极其冷静的回答主持人的问题与提出自己的观点和政纲,自由主义对持保守主义意识形态,针对二人对当今美国的总总问题,尤其是伊拉克撤军问题、经济危机、油价、福利措施、司法制度等无说不谈。主持人代表的是提问全体美国人欲知的问题与解决方法,一探二位候选人中哪一位能给予最满意的回答。

这就是民主国家的基本条件,人民需要真正满足的答案,才得以下定决心去投给一个适当人选,尤其是绵连多事之秋后一位真正能领导美国脱离危机的优秀总统和执政党。

反观马来西亚,随着在野党联盟大胜得以制衡执政联盟,民主大路在执政党所谓的开放之下正式启航。载至8月,大马人民起码看到了两场史无前例的政治辩论,称自己为民主国家的马来西亚在50年后的今天才得以看到这种民主场景,可谓相当讽刺,亦证明了大马需要强大的在野党来制衡野蛮的、反民主的一党独大的国阵政府。

辩论的愿望虽已达成,可辩论的总总形式基本上还不算成熟,何以见得?首先场合方面,我们来比较民主先驱的美国,场地选择在大学里举行,可我们的辩论却选在吉隆坡的巫统老巢礼堂,这样是否乃瞧不起在野党的辩论者?就不能选择公共场合之类的么?所幸在野党的思想确实开明,没有执政党那种狭隘的思想,尤其是人民公正党实权领袖安华对持沙比利时,他认为这是马来人争取独立运动时的开启地,也就不计较太多,毕竟他本人是马来人,不让巫统借机来污蔑他是“叛徒”。

其次是为何是又亲巫统的网络媒体来举办辩论会?反看美国,是由国家和电视台来共同协办,以表其中立的态度与立场,证实辩论会是公正的。因此此次候选人辩论选择了CBS电视台的主持人充当辩论的主持人。可我们看看无论是安华还是民主行动党秘书长林冠英对垒沙比利与许子根的两场辩论,主持人不但是亲巫统网络媒体的主席,再加上大会的参与者三分之二又是亲执政党的人物,这称得上公正、说得上中立吗?

再来则是政府还限制到场的观众,50对50的比率朝野支持者各自参半,殊不知这是以预防骚动为理由遏制人们到场观赏?数百名支持者只好在场外观看大银幕,又或者待在家里看电视算了。美国总统大选候选人、甚至政治家的辩论抑或演讲,有所谓的限制、“闭门”的状况么?这得看一个国家的民主成熟或否,依照马来西亚的情况,本人只能深表遗憾,要么不举行辩论,要么就大胆地挑战禁忌,不然则狗屁不通,什么也不是!

依照大马两场辩论来看,安华赢了第一场,是靠实际情况来对付狡辩的沙比利,而林冠英明显输了的问题,是在于敌不过许子根的强辩,以及证据的不足所造成的。缺乏火药味是小时,辩不成个答案才是大事,林冠英确实没有那个能耐,许子根生性狡猾,不然怎么可能轻易要求辩论?林冠英以现任槟城首长的身份当然不得回绝了,可见挽回面子很重要。因此,辩论除了可以传达正确的个人观点,亦可能说的是一堆谎言,听众最重要是抱着疑点与思考去聆听,而非无知的、激动的心理去凑热闹,这就不具备任何意义了,听了等于白听。

马来西亚真的民主了吗?要是真的,为何我们没有一个党与党之间的辩论?为何巫统的首相可以自选接班人,而看不到有任何人选上来挑战,上来辩论?为何不是执政联盟的国阵提拔候选人,而全是巫统的人能当首相?我的国家。。。唉

2008年10月16日星期四

麻生太郎这个人

日本果真是个封建社会,什么明治维新、民主主义,到头来还是那一套政治家世袭制。现任日本首相麻生太郎,一位据说年轻时超级帅,曾参加夏季奥林匹克运动会的政治人物,即一个典型例子。麻生竞选日本自由民主党总裁选举胜出,跃登首相之位,麻生太郎在近八年来相比世人对他不陌生,激进的言论自然不在话下,呛起声来可是绝对不输他人,如今他是新任日本国首相,是喜是祸?

麻生的老爹是搞煤矿业的,白手起家倒没错,可污点就是曾经欺压与虐待朝鲜工人,朝鲜在上世纪10年代曾沦为日本殖民地,许多人为了谋生来到了日本,而受尽了他狗日的殖民者的歧视。尤其是关东大地震发生时,生性多疑的日本人到处散播谣言说朝鲜人要暴动,结果自己先发起暴动去屠杀人,根据记载共杀了上千人之多,鬼子就那么残忍。朝鲜人的后代依在,被冠上所谓“在日朝鲜人”的帽子(朝鲜分裂后,多了所谓在日韩国人),凭朝鲜抑或韩国的户籍,其日本国民身份一直没有下落,第四代、第五代都已出现,却始终还是“朝鲜奴”。

麻生最爱看马华,所以称他为“麻生漫画太郎”并不为过,一个人活到六十多岁还在阅读漫画倒真是有点奇怪,其官方座车内就已堆了数十本漫画杂志与单行本就可看出是如此的狂热。其担任安倍内阁的外交部长时还大谈漫画外交,要是真正大胆去推行的话,效果肯定不得了,看看我们现在的年轻人,迷日本动漫、搞什么 Cosplay等哈日到不行,中国人到底在反什么日、抗什么日呀?中日不是老早就已经建交了么?那些白痴首相要去拜靖国神社就让他去呗!看他们到底是真哀悼炮灰,还是为了面子、权力才去敬拜的。小泉纯一郎就那么地蠢,但他可是改革成功的典型模范呀,毕竟他是田中角荣之女所细心栽培出来的,日本就在小泉任内经济稍微好转的,他拜神社自然就会被原谅。可中国、韩国最敏感,却不是以日本人民之观点为出发点。

麻生的家世不简单,很复杂却似乎很有趣,简直是一部现当代日本史话。麻生母辈的先祖爷是谁?为萨摩藩维新志士、明治三杰中的一位,后被武士暗杀的大久保利通,其母是前首相吉田茂之女,其妹信子则嫁给了三笠宫宽仁亲王,何许人也?昭和天皇之弟三笠宫崇仁之子,亦为当今天皇明仁之堂弟也,麻生的妻子亦为前首相之一的铃木善幸之女。麻生家族显赫的身世何止局限在政治世家?起码还兼具武士、商人、皇室等,是一等大贵族也!要是在战前日本来说,他已是华族的其中一员了,不,麻生本身已是华族之后代。

日本自民党政府自二战以来派系林立,像这种清一色政治世家为主的政治家多得数不清,前两任的安倍晋三与福田康夫便是最佳的例子。而自民党中有九个稳定的派系,麻生却出奇的是亲华的河野派(现今的大勇会麻生派)里的一员,比起强大的町村派(清和政策研究会,前森派;小泉与安倍属这派),麻生之所以能立足可说是一种必然巧合。自小泉卸任,日本的大改革走到了谷底,安倍两边路线模糊,福田政策偏柔,加上日本经济陆续衰败、人民怨声、哀声并起;麻生就有着这鼓豪壮之气,三次竞选总裁失败的教训锻炼成了今日的刚强,他是否能顺利实行改革目前还不知道,其支持力也远不如小泉、安倍与福田,麻生剩下的也只有那丝毫的壮气了。

麻生是个保守派,自民党的首相至今没有一位不是保守派、鹰派,鸽派的福田康夫做不出什么成绩来,估计强硬手段的政策即将翻身。麻生虽不称得上是个右派,但在对华政策上应该也不会就此放宽,他若要证明自己是个能拯救日本政局的话,就得摒弃安倍的“美丽国家”政策与福田的怀柔政策,杀出一条较为中立的、自主的、独特的麻生太郎路线。想要麻生搞亲华政策已经不大可能,对他却也构不成一个大问题,而日本的民生问题才是最头痛的一环,尤其是面对自民党的死对头-参议院的最大在野党民主党党魁的小泽一郎,麻生太郎得好好地加油去评定这场累计已久的政治乱局、安定整个社会、并且福利于人民,否则明年的9月又得再来个辞退声明,到时就真的是没完没了了。

2008年10月14日星期二

倒西方恶性资本主义

在今日的《环球时报》(10月14日)读到一篇关于当今世界经济衰败的文章"美欧民众痛斥银行家",欧美人民总算发现那些所谓善良的背后皆是谎言与骗局的资本家的真面目了,恭喜他们!帝国主义国家的人民在上世纪20年代深受过的教训再次重演,所有的美梦就要从这儿全部砸碎吧!

他们不能全怪George W Bush,抑或Alan Greenspan还是Bill Gates等人,这就是美国,甚至欧洲应当承受的后果,长久累计下来的烂摊子,一次过爆发就是一种可怖的现实,反映了资本主义自开始、蓬勃发展、衰弱、翻身,接着等待一步步走向灭亡。资本主义是只巨兽,也就是Behemoth,它主导了世界的金融,人类的财富。无论是帝国主义还是殖民主义,资本主义象征的皆是邪恶的,就算其本质与出发点是善良的也好,事到如今一切似乎已成为定居,人们彻底看清了这只巨兽的死期已到,不得不将它拿下。美国政府就算再拨7千亿也无济于事了,亦不管它救不救雷曼兄弟,反正美国政府就决定袖手旁观。雷曼兄弟就死在欧洲银行的毁约,而美政府一旦出手相救,其仍会被人民指责是在挽救资本家。。。其实它早就救了AIG,其他的得慢慢来,所以美政府才会被人嘲讽为USSA-美利坚苏维埃邦联联合政府的原因吧?美政府将所有企业收为国有,无非是想继续拥护这些大财阀,就这么简单而已。事情稳定后,资本家依旧无事,资本家可以赎回企业,而亏得就是你老百姓的钱,这样值得么?

人说共产党最喜欢预测未来,果真是如此。一百年前,列宁曾说过帝国主义走到最高峰时期资本主义会彻底瓦解掉,全数倾盘,是没错,但不是二十世纪,亦非十月革命成功、苏联建立就证明了它已经死亡,毕竟只是推翻了沙王的封建制度而已。社会主义不能过于急促,是靠时间与实践逐步完成的,要想一飞冲天,就会饿死很多人,以中国为例如大跃进;又被那些不知所谓的小人所摆弄,搞得民不聊生,如文革。搞计划经济也是上世纪共产党的弱点,看看苏联与东欧卫星国,物质短缺渐严重、加上苏联的亲西方到大搞其所谓“改革开放”-Perestoika y Glasnost,由于整个过程失策,因而为灭亡卖下了伏笔。毕竟资本主义复辟时期是上世纪6、70年代,连社会主义大国都受到其牵连,不得不对这群罪魁祸首的修义正主分子大加鞭挞。资本主义当时是只猛兽,冲击了世界各个角落,中国干脆地来个姓资又姓社,加紧脚步大刀阔斧搞生产、加速发展,才免于受“苏东波”接踵而来的社会主义集体大亡国影响,苏联老大哥最后崩塌掉的悲惨局面。

再说,良性的资本主义是被允许的,起码当今存在的社会主义国家依然坚信这点。可良性到底有多良性?马克思也说过不能没有资本主义,经济缺了这一块就会没有意义,这句话倒没错。可西方帝国主义的恶性资本主义却因冷战结束,所谓全球化的崛起,新自由主义市场经济就一直不停地在侵蚀全世界的一切。美国打着民主的旗号撒野,没人能阻止它,因为它有钱有势,加上战争不断,美国财务面临巨大的亏空,真是活该。欧洲受美国拖累的难道还不够?如今欧盟各国开始在大谈社会主义经济,欲从社会主义的经验中来拜托资本主义的祸害,这是可行的唯一方针。看人家委内瑞拉的查韦斯,搞左翼运动搞得多么有声有色,古巴至今也未承受过什么经济压力,美国再不从中反省,灭亡的可是自己,而不单只是邪恶的资本主义。

2008年9月20日星期六

Raja Petra's deteriorating health (ALIRAN)

Aliran is seriously concerned over the deteriorating health of Raja
Petra. According to his wife, Marina Lee Abdullah, "he does not look
good and healthy at all".

The deteriorating health of Raja Petra is totally due to the callous
treatment of him by the police, who have completely ignored the
universal norms that a detainee is entitled to.

"He has been denied sleep and is being put through mental torture,"
said his wife after visiting Raja Petra.

By her account, Raja Petra had been harassed psychologically in police
custody. This stress under extreme custodial conditions has caused
Raja Petra to lose weight and he is feeling weak. This is a cause for
concern as he is suffering from a heart ailment.

"He spoke very softly and looked weak, pale and tremendously thin,"
Marina told reporters. She attributed this to the fact that Raja Petra
was suffering from a lack of sleep because the previous night, he was
harassed hourly by officers who recorded statements from him.

Marina has every right to be worried over his health because "her
husband suffers from heart artery blockages and is on medication". At
this point in time nobody can confirm if Raja Petra is taking his
medication or whether he is being monitored by a doctor.

What he is being subjected to is absolutely unacceptable and uncalled
for. What makes it worse is the fact that Raja Petra's human rights
are being violated with impunity by a country that sits as a member on
the United Nations Human Rights Council that is tasked with protecting
and preserving human rights. It makes a mockery of our position on
this Council and renders it untenable.

Raja Petra has been arbitrarily arrested, subjected to cruel, inhuman
and degrading treatment, and denied a fair and public hearing by an
independent and impartial tribunal in determining his guilt. He has
not been recognised as a person before the law and has been denied his
right to freedom of thought and conscience. All these are serious
violations which must be thoroughly condemned. This cannot be condoned
especially when the perpetrator is a member of the Human Rights Council.

Aliran calls upon the Malaysian government to stop its violation of
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to release Raja Petra
immediately and to live up to its obligations as a member of the
United Nations.

Malaysians no longer believe that the Barisan Nasional has acted
honourably, objectively and sincerely in the national interests of
Malaysia in detaining Raja Petra, Teresa Kok, the Hindraf Five and all
the others under the unjust ISA.

P Ramakrishnan
President
18 September

The Malaysian government is guilty of violating Article 5 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights which states: "No one shall be
subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment."

The Malaysian government is guilty of violating Article 6 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights which states: "Everyone has the
right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law."

The Malaysian government is guilty of violating Article 9 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights which states: "No one shall be
subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile."

The Malaysian government is guilty of violating Article 10 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights which states: "Everyone is
entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an
independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights
and obligations and of any criminal charge against him."

The Malaysian government is guilty of violating Article 18 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights which states: "Everyone has the
right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right
includes freedom to change to change his religion or belief, and
freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or
private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice,
worship and observance."

Aliran Kesedaran Negara (ALIRAN)
(National Consciousness Movement)
103 Medan Penaga, 11600 Penang, Malaysia
Tel: +60 (0)4 658 5251
Fax: +60 (0)4 658 5197
e-mail: alirankn@hotmail.com

2008年9月17日星期三

变天不必太急


针对“黑眼圈来了”(http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/89869)这篇文章,我只能说这个作者似乎思想太单纯了,基本上大多马来西亚人民都知道安华领导的变天根本就不会落在“9.16”,为什么?其中一点就是回教徒正处于斋戒月,安华是个相当重视回教教义的政治人物,斋戒月不得搞政治活动的传统难道他会不知道吗?

就只哪么个“9.16”就说人家在撒谎?这未免太过幼稚了吧?国阵讲了那么多年种族和谐和民主自由,有那些真的做到了?尤其是阿都拉所谓的“肃贪活动”根本就是废话,马来西亚的局势越来越紧张,司法无任何改革、极端种族主义者日渐无法无天、警察的权力大过天,什么都有,就是没有看见啥真正的民主。或许国阵以为当今的大马能给予在野党很多机会就是民主,那相对的,没有它“授予”既是独裁了吧?拉惹柏特拉与郭淑沁无端端在内按法令下被逮捕,这就是国阵的所谓“你民我主”吧?

支持民主,盼望民主到来的人民,时机还未成熟才是个问题,我们目前只能慢慢地等待,看安华、看民联怎么去实现和平的政府轮替,毕竟我们不知道国阵尤其是巫统会再耍什么样的把戏。我们,热爱民主、期盼改革的大马人民必须觉醒,能够看清国阵腐败不堪的真相,彻底地否决掉它们那些伪君子作风、讲一套做一套的行为再说。安华也知道要是真的不能变天的话,过了“9.16”后他最好尽快收手,可是他并没有这么做。证明了他的皇牌还未使出,只是不在今天打出来而已,阿都拉应该感谢安华给他机会反省才对,再嚣张下去恐怕已经无济于事了。

此外,我们不要忘记“9.16”,它提醒了我们这才是马来西亚联邦真正的创建日,而非“8.31”,尽然已经过去,我们就只好再期待着下一次的到来。31人的过继,看得出是在讲笑的吗?这可是一场民主政变呐!要是说公正党议员到台湾去拉人“很低级、很不干净”,那国阵把议员藏起来的行为就很干净吗?光只会空讲些无聊的道德观,倒不如先去读懂大马那残酷且荒谬的法令再来说吧!这样你就会明白为何他们要大老远跑到台湾去“拉人”了。